Thanks for the feedback to my posts that I put. are very much useful. Just to talk to Checco Zalone.
Just two commentaries (not is a typo) on the comments I received for the last post.
1) It 'my conviction that unfortunately is not possible to achieve zero losses for any type of strategy. So it is obvious that the problems in what is port forward. We also discussed the issue of HYIP-er of the optimal number in which to invest.
Someone brought forward, not without reason, the argument that the HYIP to "higher level" and that many were not, however, increase dramatically the numbers of HYIP portfolio gives rise to the "junk" as it were in the basket.
The argument is right but from my point of vistra, statistically speaking, increase the numbers of HYIP portfolio reduces the risk of exchange rather than increase it. Or better to decrease the weight loss scam.
If we add to this that Orman is also clear that the HYIP that someone thought to be invincible if you have the germ of the risk of scams, I believe that this hypothetical distinction between first-and second HYIP has the contours impalpable. But it is just an opinion .....
still seems obvious that you can not attend a portfolio of a huge number of HYIP. Perhaps this issue should not be greater than 25-30 or maybe more if the funds are so many ....... It would be mostly too scattered.
Someone asked me how long it takes to take or view the programs. In fact, if you want to organize there a little. Let's say a 15-minute total. Sometimes not. There are
bronswer, such as Mozilla Firefox, which can store passwords for access after you enter a general password input. I have the programs organized into folders favorite cuts of 15. I open all the cards and as programs are loaded, I opened automatically without typing anything. At that, if I go and fetch cie something to be taken and out. It takes very few minutes. And then I go back to work. Then follow 30 or 40 programs is not an impossibility.
2) on the speech of the costs of collection were I absolutely agree. It 's part of my strategy always taken. I do not know if the day after the program will be there to pay. And do not tell me that I am a suspicious because ....... Well look around the latest scam!
Honestly costs are almost equal, among others. Once I did the accounts. If a program pays me 80 cents a day, taking me with Liberty Reserve costs $ 0.01, or a penny. After 5 days I took 0.80 x 5 = $ 4.0 with a cost of $ 0.05.
If I had to wait five days to withdraw all the $ 4 I would have argued with a cost of $ 0.04.
The cost difference between the two methods is 0.01 $!!!!!!!!!!
What are the benefits from? Which reduces the risk of not taking anything for a sudden scam. If we talk of e-currency Perfect Money like that do not cost anything to pick the speech does not arise.
3) Probably what I propose is complicated. But it is also a matter of choice. Some people prefer to invest here and there such as instinct tells him, without even keeping an account of the thing. So when a program scam does not even know if we have recovered, or at the end won. Fortunately, there is freedom of movement and choice.
The bottom line is that I try to share with you experiences that are personal. Far from
I propose as a model of absolute truth.
Fucilatemi if you notice that I'm doing to take a hand in this regard.
I support the American pragmatic philosophy of James of the century which holds that what is true is what works. Obviously things are not black and white but shades of gray scales of justice, and then (and truth).
Thanks anyway for what you write because it spurs me to look again at things from different points of view and this is basically the process that makes people grow.
dell'oppotunità So thanks to growing with you.
Per aspera ad astra!
0 comments:
Post a Comment